What Is the Iran War Costing Us? How Does $1 Billion per Day Sound?

Here’s a Donald Trump quote to try on for size, on the dangers of entanglement in foreign wars in the Middle East: “We could have rebuilt our country twice,” said Trump, speaking in 2016 during his first Presidential campaign about the drawn-out conflicts the U.S. had struggled to extricate itself from in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Imagine if that money had been spent here at home.”

Yes, imagine. We now find ourselves almost 10 years later, and Trump has submerged not just the United States but the entire globe in a purely ego-driven conflict with Iran that has choked the world economy to the breaking point with its disruptions of everything from the flow of oil, to the availability of fertilizer for food production. Every day, Trump proclaims simultaneously that the war is about to end, and that the U.S. bombing campaign is also about to intensify. Every day, we learn of some new military failure, like the fact that Iran apparently shot another American jet from the sky within the last 24 hours, with the fate of the pilots unknown. What is it all costing us? Well, how does an estimated $1 billion per day in direct military spending so far strike you? Of course, that’s merely a measure of the money we’re burning on things like flying jets and firing munitions. The rest of us on the homestead are paying for the Iran War in things like surging gasoline and grocery prices, while Donald Trump’s approval rating smashes through historic lows.

Trump recklessly decided to wage an illegal war against Iran with no plan to manage the fallout, and now American households are paying the price.

According to a @jecdems.bsky.social analysis, since the start of the war just a month ago, Americans have spent $8.4 BILLION more on gas.

— Congressman Don Beyer (@beyer.house.gov) Apr 2, 2026 at 6:14 PM

So yes, imagine, as Trump asked us, if that kind of spending was directed at domestic programs that would actually lower costs of necessities like healthcare, childcare, education or housing for American citizens. Imagine if Trump actually gave a shit about boosting American manufacturing, as he so often vowed to do. Imagine if those goals were reflected in any way in the unveiling of the 2027 budget that Trump will be asking Congress to sign off on. And then stop imagining, and instead accept the cold reality of everything Trump and the GOP will be planning on cutting in order to fund an incredibly unpopular war instead.

“The United States can’t take care of day care,” said Trump to the media at the White House this week. “It’s not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare, all of these individual things, they can do it on a state basis. We have to take care of one thing: Military protection.”

Ah good, it’s always comforting to hear the President of the United States casually mention that the nation is unable to “take care” of the entire social safety net. It’s almost surprising he didn’t remember to mention that we also can’t take care of social security in there, alongside healthcare for Americans. Although I’m sure he’ll probably get around to mentioning that soon. As for that “day care” reference, Trump reportedly said that states should raise taxes in order to pay for it, a sentiment he’ll no doubt deny when someone next brings up why he’s in favor of higher taxes. Following the above comments, the White House’s brood of PR spokesfolks leapt into action with their “He didn’t really mean what he was saying about _____” routine, saying that his threats to Medicare and Medicaid were merely references to “eliminating fraud.” As White House spokesperson Olivia Wales put it: “The president proudly signed historic legislation eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits for nearly all seniors and barring illegal immigrants and other ineligible individuals from fraudulently receiving Medicare and Medicaid benefits. The Trump economic agenda will continue to lower costs, making everyday life more affordable for hard-working American families.”

Of course, in order to “continue” lowering costs, the Trump administration would need to have already accomplished something on that front, when in fact the opposite is true. Projections for U.S. inflation remain scary, and as Jacob Weindling has pointed out, no one in the administration has an articulated plan to save the economy even if the Iran War was to end today.

Trump last year: “I’m not going to touch Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.”

Trump today: “It’s not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare.”

[image or embed]

— Home of the Brave (@ofthebraveusa.bsky.social) Apr 1, 2026 at 8:09 PM

And the war isn’t ending today, or tomorrow. If it was, then the Pentagon wouldn’t be asking for $200 billion in funding for it, which is, by the way, more money than the U.S. has sunk into more than four years of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Trump, likewise, wouldn’t be seeking $1.5 TRILLION for defense spending in the upcoming budget, if this was a conflict that was “ending,” or one that we’d already won. That would be, by the way, a roughly 40% bump over the already record high level of defense spending that was approved for 2026. We are venturing into entirely uncharted waters in terms of how wantonly we’re choosing to commit the entirety of the nation’s spending to the military industrial complex.

And all they’re asking for in return is a reported $73 billion in “cuts across domestic agencies,” which could include everything from the elimination of funds for training teachers, to $15 billion in canceled investment in clean energy (amid an energy crisis), to various cuts for programs that aid in housing access for Americans. All in all, the budget proposal the White House is putting forth is expected to ask Congress to slash domestic spending by 10%, even as it also apparently includes $40 billion in new funding for the post-Pam Bondi Justice Department, which clearly needs that money to more effectively bring sham indictments against Trump’s enemies.

Ironically, even those drastic cuts to domestic programs meant to somehow “offset” the fantastical increases in defense spending obviously do not balance them out–$73 billion in “savings,” as it turns out, is still a rather smaller number than roughly $500 billion in additional spending. All told, you’re potentially looking at another $5 or $6 trillion for the national debt in the next decade; small potatoes for the party that regularly runs for office on concerns over fiscal responsibility, only to suddenly find itself justifying military quagmires and money pits as soon as it has control over the government. I don’t suppose there’s any more effective way we might have spent today’s $1 billion the Iran War is costing us–perhaps tomorrow’s $1 billion will finally be the expenditure that turns things around?