Your Guide to Arkansas' Bullshit Gay Marriage Non-Ruling
In DepthThe top court in Arkansas has ruled that due to multiple laws defining marriage as not recognised between same-sex couples, the previous ruling is “incomplete,” and a ban on same-sex marriage is still in effect. Well. Halfsies. Maybe? Stop bothering us!
Last week Judge Chris Piazza declared the state’s ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. He refused to put a stay/injunction on his ruling, expecting near immediate compliance with his decision. Piazza cited Loving v. Virgina in his last paragraph, finishing it with a resounding, “it is so ORDERED.”
Supreme Court of Arkansas’ response here is complicated, but let’s look at a portion of the text. Disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, although I did my master’s work in Government, and that included 24 hours of law courses, including three different courses dealing with American constitutional law. I could be wrong, but I will attempt to explain what’s going on here:
Second, the State asserts that even if we dismiss the appeal, we should use our superintending authority to grant a stay because circuit and county clerks are confused as to whether they may issue same-sex marriage licenses. ‘We turn again to the circuit court’s order. Here, the circuit court did not issue a ruling with regard to Ark. Code Ann. $ 9-11-208(b) (Repl. 2009), “License not issued to persons of the same sex.” Therefore, the circuit court’s order has no effect on Ark. Code Ann. S 9-11-208(b) and its prohibition against circuit and county clerks issuing same-sex marriage licenses.
Accordingly, we deny the State’s petition for an emergency stay of the circuit court’s May 9, 2014 order. Motion to dismiss appeal granted without prejudice; motion for emergency stay denied.
Okay, so, the parties that appealed and sought a stay on Piazza’s ruling? Well, those folks appealed based on the idea that a second law prohibited counties from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples and that the decision by Piazza was rendered moot because he would have had to rule both laws unconstitutional and direct counties to ignore both laws.