Yet Another Trump Appointee Refuses to Answer the Question: “Who Won the 2020 Election?”
Jon Ossoff: "Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this question? To have to indulge the President’s delusions?"
Screenshot, Twitter SplinterTrump Administration Elections
It seems like a simple enough question, does it not? “Who won the 2020 election?” It’s not an overly long hypothetical to get all tripped up about. And if even the average audience member walking dejectedly out of a theater after witnessing the shameless weirdness of the Moana remake this weekend could reasonably be expected to answer the question, then one would think the bar would be just a scooch higher for a man in a job interview to be the Director of National Intelligence, a cabinet-level position. After all, if the person nominated for that job is not aware of who won any given election, are they even certain who it is that nominated them for the post? Color us shocked, then, that DNI nominee Jay Clayton flat-out refused, over and over, to answer the question “Who won the 2020 election?” while being grilled by the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday. No one could have seen such behavior coming.
Except wait, no, this has actually become the de facto position for Trump’s nominees and appointees to take, because if you reply that Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential election and then became President for four years, an incensed Trump will immediately strip you of your nomination and find someone willing to plead the fifth. The closest a nominee can come to publicly admitting this without Trump dispatching SEAL Team Six is to use language like saying that Biden was “certified” as the winner of the 2020 election, without actually admitting that he received more votes than Trump. One person who clearly understands this dynamic quite well is Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff, who we must commend for the absolutely brutal and unrelenting pressure he subjected Jay Clayton to this afternoon, by simply attempting to get him to answer the simplest freaking questions imaginable. You really have to watch this play out for two minutes at a time to truly appreciate just how much Ossoff turns Clayton into a quivering, spineless puddle of ooze.
OSSOFF: “.. Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this question? To have to indulge the President’s delusions?”
— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) 12:10 PM · Jul 15, 2026
Watching that, you can see why Ossoff’s name has become so popular among strategists mulling over who could win the Presidency as a Democratic Party nominee in 2028, provided of course that he wins reelection in his Senate race in the upcoming November midterm elections, where he seems to be considered the modest favorite at the moment. Here is a guy with an iron disposition and an unflappable vibe, calmly refusing to allow the duplicitous liar sitting in front of him to minimize his refusal to answer questions about his capacity to serve as the director of national intelligence. He has the patience to continue hammering away on the same topic as Clayton pretends he’s never heard of the 2020 election or claims he’s “already answered” the question (he hasn’t), and then he shifts to shaming him directly to his face with this fantastic closer: “Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this question? To have to indulge the President’s delusions? We know, you know, everybody in this room knows the truthful answer to that question. Why can you not give it?”
That wasn’t even Ossoff’s only pantsing of Clayton on national television, either. He also trapped Clayton in an endless spiral of trying to get the DNI nominee to acknowledge that he was aware of how his predecessor Tulsi Gabbard was present at a raid seizing election data from a polling place in Georgia, with Clayton at one point suggesting that he had only learned about this national news story while speaking to Ossoff in his office yesterday. He also claimed to have no awareness that Gabbard had testified her presence at the raid was requested by President Trump, and likewise that he was totally ignorant of the fact that the same Senate Intelligence Committee is still investigating Gabbard for potential misconduct. Truly, it was a classic entry in the annals of the “I’m interviewing for this job while claiming to have no knowledge whatsoever of national media stories about my immediate predecessor” logic. Sounds like a fitting intelligence chief: Someone who doesn’t even know what’s in the newspaper headlines, much less in classified reports.
OSSOFF: Are you aware that Gabbard was present at the Fulton County raid?
CLAYTON: …O: What is going on here?
C: … …
O: Are you aware that members of this committee are probing Gabbard’s potential misconduct?
CLAYTON: …. Uh uh ….
COTTON: Senator Ossoff your time is expired!
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 11:36 AM · Jul 15, 2026
Jay Clayton, perhaps unsurprisingly, owes more or less his entire career in government directly to Donald Trump. He has no experience whatsoever working in any intelligence agency or in the intelligence field, but instead hails from a background as a Wall Street attorney. He was made a chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission during the first Trump presidency, and was then appointed as the “interim” U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York by Trump in April of 2025, in order to get around the fact that he wouldn’t be confirmed by the Senate as the permanent U.S Attorney. His appointment was later approved by the district’s federal judges in August of 2025.
In stepping in as the Director of National Intelligence, Clayton would be replacing the brief acting DNI (post-Tulsi Gabbard) Bill Pulte, whose flagrant lack of qualifications as the leader of a federal mortgage regulation agency was too much for even the Trump-dominated Congress to accept. Members of both parties flagged Pulte’s dangerous lack of qualifications and experience for the top job in American intelligence. Pulte will apparently now retreat to becoming a more active Trump lackey, and will apparently appear alongside the President in a national Thursday night televised broadcast where Trump is expected to rant about foreign intervention in U.S. elections in hopes of sowing more distrust of American democracy.
Sadly, Clayton of course appears to be just as bad as Pulte would have been: We need look no further than being absolutely flabbergasted when asked to simply name who won the 2020 election. Only a month ago in early June, Clayton appeared in a segment on CNBC where on the topic of election integrity he said “We’re doing an absolutely terrible job, and the American people are right to question it.” He also referred to mail-voting laws in general as represented an “opportunity for fraud.”
But hey, at least you can watch the guy’s soul attempting to leave his body as Sen. Ossoff forces him to state on camera that Donald Trump pardoned a convicted narco-trafficker who sent more than 400 tons of narcotics to the United States! This guy may end up running the country’s intelligence apparatus, but at least the likes of Ossoff are ready to nail him to the wall for all to see.
Sen. Ossoff: Did Trump pardon a convicted narcotrafficker?
Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton: Yes.
— FactPost (@factpostnews.bsky.social) 11:49 AM · Jul 15, 2026
Keep scrolling for more great stories.