James Woods Is This Close to Discovering Who Called Him a 'Ridiculous Scum Clown-Boy' on Twitter

By Anna Merlan | February 11, 2016 | 7:45pm

Latest

James Woods has spent the last six months engaged in two very meaningful pursuits: tweeting, mainly about politics—Obama is popular among people on welfare, Bernie Sanders is a “commie scarecrow”—and suing the anonymous Twitter user who called him a “cocaine addict” and a “ridiculous scum clown-boy.” On Wednesday, Woods got one step closer to discovering the identity of whoever’s calling him a ridiculous scum clown-boy.

Woods filed a defamation suit in July in Los Angeles County Superior Court against a person who tweeted under the name Abe List, and who used that account to accuse Woods of snorting cocaine, as well as being a prick, a joke, and a ridiculous scum clown-boy, none of which are nice things to say to anyone, but the last of which is pretty funny. (“Cocaine addict” is the only one that is actually defamatory and not just an insult.)

Most Popular

Twitter has stoutly refused to give up the name of the person who thinks Woods is a cocaine-using ridiculous scum clown-boy—that person has been sending a lawyer to court solo instead of appearing in person. But the case swung in Woods’ direction yesterday, when a judge denied the defense’s motion to strike.

The motion was based on California’s anti-SLAPP laws, which are designed to protect people’s First Amendment rights. But Judge Mel Red Recana sided, surprisingly, with Woods, writing in a decision that many people would interpret the “cocaine addict” thing to be factual, an argument that Woods’ lawyers also made in their motion opposing the order to strike. (They even hired a linguistics professor to opine that most Twitter users would interpret “cocaine addict” as a statement of fact.)

The Hollywood Reporter got hold of the judge’s order, which actually says that any reader of the tweet “could and indeed must view it as a statement of fact:

Applying the totality of circumstances test, and examining the plain language of the Tweet, it is clear that any reader of the AL False Statement could and indeed must view it as a statement of fact. As described by Professor Finegan, AL’s use of a prenomial characterization (i.e. ‘cocaine addict’) followed by a proper noun (i.e., ‘James Woods’) is a well-established linguistic structure widely used to characterize people with shorthand factual information. Prof. Finegan’s opinion that ‘many if not all readers of the “cocaine addict” Tweet will understand and interpret Abe List to be making a factual claim about James Woods — namely that he is a cocaine addict’ is on an issue of fact. His opinion is sufficiently beyond common experience and assists the trier of fact.

The lawsuit will proceed to discovery, where Woods and his attorneys will continue trying to determine who thinks he’s a ridiculous scum clown-boy.

Woods is very excited about his victory:

He then got right back to tweeting outraged things about Hillary Clinton.

Abe List, meanwhile, has protected his Twitter account, his location now reads, “Acting on advice of counsel.”

Contact the author at [email protected].
Public PGP key
PGP fingerprint: 67B5 5767 9D6F 652E 8EFD 76F5 3CF0 DAF2 79E5 1FB6

Image via AP.