Supreme Court Rejects Ohio State’s Plea to Throw Out Hundreds of Men’s Sex Abuse Lawsuits
"Today, I have some relief that our system might be flawed, but truth and justice--should--and did prevail," Rocky Ratliff, a survivor, told Jezebel.
JusticePolitics

On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it would ignore the Ohio State University’s call to reconsider a lower court ruling that empowers hundreds of alumni and former student-athletes to sue the billion-dollar institution for its role in enabling two decades of sexual abuse by a doctor in its athletic department, the late Richard Strauss.
Per the Associated Press, two cases that centered on Strauss’ abuse were among the list of cases the court said it wouldn’t hear. Last September, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to revive the lawsuits against the university, noting that a district judge had erred in dismissing them due to the state’s statute of limitations in 2021. The ruling stated that the survivors—the majority of which are men—“plausibly allege a decades-long cover up” and “adequately allege that they did not know and could not reasonably have known that Ohio State injured them until 2018.” The university then responded by seeking reconsideration from SCOTUS.
“Today, I have some relief that our system might be flawed, but truth and justice—should—and did prevail,” Rocky Ratliff, an attorney representing one of the other two groups of Strauss survivors and a survivor himself, told Jezebel. “The Supreme Court, for me as an attorney, is hope for the average guy—for the little guy—and they proved it today by not hearing Ohio State’s plea.”