House Republicans Just Endorsed an Abortion Ban That Could Also Ban IVF
Members of the House Republican Study Committee released a budget for the fiscal year 2025 that backs the Life at Conception Act—a bill that would grant personhood to embryos from fertilization and could ban IVF nationwide.
Photos: Shutterstock AbortionPolitics
After weeks of frenzied denials from Republican politicians that they do not want to ban IVF (or, in the case of House Speaker Mike Johnson, concerningly ambiguous and non-committal comments on the fertility technology), a new budget backed by 80% of House Republicans proved—again—that it was all bullshit. First reported by HuffPost on Thursday, the House Republican Study Committee—which comprises 80% of the caucus, including Reps. Lauren Boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Brian Mast, Steve Scalise, Kevin Hern, and Johnson—released a budget proposal for the fiscal year 2025, which backs the Life at Conception Act.
The bill, which drew over 125 Republican co-sponsors last year, grants legal personhood rights to embryos starting from “the moment of fertilization,” meaning the bill could effectively ban IVF nationwide. The Life at Conception Act has yet to be put to a vote but has come under unique scrutiny—along with its co-sponsors and backers—in light of recent, heightened threats to IVF. In February, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are “children” who qualify for wrongful death lawsuits. Not only did this plunge access to IVF—which requires routine destruction of embryos—into chaos across the state but it also means there’s now terrifying legal precedent for the anti-abortion, anti-science “life begins at conception” framework.