​Women's Charity Looks into Sweatshop Allegations Over "Feminist" Shirts

In the report, Ben Ellery visited one of the factories, writing that workers make 62p per hour and sleep in “spartan dormitories, 16 to a room.”

But The Mail on Sunday has toured a factory producing the T-shirts, where workers earn just 6,000 rupees a month – equivalent to £120.

That’s about $192 USD per month, $2,304 per year. It appears to be above minimum wage in Mauritius, which (according to Wikipedia) is $1050 USD. Not that it’s a lot of money to live on in the first place obviously. To compare, last year Bangaladesh increased the minimum wage for garment workers to $68/month—a move that was met with protest from workers demanding at least $100/month. And recently, garment workers in Cambodia have demanded minimum wage be raised to $177/month. I mean, we can always stand to do more to ensure protection and better payment for garment workers.

The figure is just a quarter of the country’s average monthly wage, and around half of what a waiter earns. Each ‘feminist’ T-shirt costs just £9 to make, but high street chain Whistles sells them for £45 each – a figure it would take the women a week and a half to earn.

At one factory visited by The Mail on Sunday, a female worker told us: ‘How can this T-shirt be a symbol of feminism when we do not see ourselves as feminists? We see ourselves as trapped.’

In light of the report, the Fawcett Society has responded, claiming they were informed that the shirts were made ethically. Eva Neitzert, Deputy CEO of the Fawcett Society admitted that in a meeting with Whistles over the summer, they had agreed to make the shirts ethically in the UK, but someone didn’t get the memo:

“As a charity that campaigns on women’s rights in the labour market, we have been concerned right from the outset of our collaboration with ELLE magazine that any products meet rigorous ethical standards.

“Upon receiving samples of the range at our offices in early October we noted that the t-shirts had in fact been produced in Mauritius, upon which we queried (over email) the ethical credentials of the Mauritian factory, and the fabric used.

Whistles had assured them that the Mauritian manufacturer CMT was legit:

CMT has Oekotex accreditation, which fully conforms to the highest standards in quality & environmental policy, whilst having world class policies for sustainable development, social, ethical and environmental compliance.

Confident with Whistles’ endorsement and CMT’s credibility, the Fawcett Society went on with the collaboration anyway.

“We have been very disappointed to hear the allegations that conditions in the Mauritius factory may not adhere to the ethical standards that we, as the Fawcett Society, would require of any product that bears our name. At this stage, we require evidence to back up the claims being made by a journalist at the Mail on Sunday. However, as a charity that campaigns on issues of women’s economic equality, we take these allegations extremely seriously and will do our utmost to investigate them.

“If any concrete and verifiable evidence of mistreatment of the garment producers emerges, we will require Whistles to withdraw the range with immediate effect and donate part of the profits to an ethical trading campaigning body.

Image via Elle.