Being Conventionally Cute Is Not Enough For The Food Network. What Is?
LatestFrank Bruni‘s profile in the new NY Times Magazine uses Katie Lee to chart the Hollywood-ization of food. It also suggests that, as in any show business endeavor, being very pretty isn’t necessarily enough to make you a real star.
It might be enough to catch the eye of Billy Joel, of course. Marrying him at 23 unquestionably helped catapult Lee from being a small-town culinary aspirant to mingling with the right people in the Hamptons. (They divorced last year after almost five years). But the profile portrays a successful woman who is trying to power through the wall between her and mega-stardom.
It reminded me of the 2003 New Yorker profile of actress Jaime Pressly, “The Almost It-Girl,” about toiling on the margins of being the next big thing. (From the abstract: “She is typically cast on the strength of her looks and her Southern sassiness, and she has had girlfriend roles in several forgettable teensploitation flicks.”)
After one season on Top Chef — she was replaced by Padma Lakshmi, another famous man’s gorgeous ex-wife, with more personal staying power — Lee can’t seem to get on the Food Network, whose executives don’t find her “catchy” enough. Absent the down-home appeal of Paula Deen (whom Bruni calls “Dolly Parton with a deep fryer”) or the down-to-earth accessibility of Rachael Ray (seen mobbed here), Lee’s next packaging move appears to be in the direction of a chick-lit sensibility, incongruously overseen by Brett Ratner. Bruni recounts a production meeting: