Christian Investors Urge Pharmacies Not to Stock Abortion Pill Because It Will Eliminate Future Customers
Barf Bag: They seem not to realize that humans still need food and clothes regardless of how many children they have.
Photo: Getty Images Politics
Sometimes the forced-birth freaks go fully mask off and make clear that they oppose abortion because they care about having more humans to buy things.
This week, the right-wing law firm from Alliance Defending Freedom released multiple letters from Christian investors urging Costco, Walmart, Kroger, Albertsons, and McKesson not to stock the abortion drug mifepristone at their pharmacies. (Importantly, the drug is also used to manage miscarriages.) The signatories—who hold $172 million in ownership of the five publicly-traded retailers—argue that not only is filling mifepristone prescriptions “politically fraught,” but that facilitating abortions would reduce their customer base and make the companies less money in the long term. I am not joking.
Here’s a snippet from the ADF-facilitated letter:
Shrinking your customer base is also bad for business. The Brookings Institution recently estimated that the average American family will spend $310,000 to raise a child born in 2015. This includes over $50,000 in food and $15,000 on clothes, not to mention furniture, other household and healthcare items, toys and games, or diapers and formula, all things your stores sell. Dispensing the abortion drug will reduce demand for all of these and only make worse the crisis of record low birth rates.
Do these people realize that humans still need food and clothes regardless of how many children they have? Trying to guilt these huge corporations with talk about birth rates is just the white supremacist cherry on top.
But the Christian investors got even more specific in their concerns about just how much money they think these companies could lose. In a statement, investor David Bahnsen said this, perhaps not realizing that already-born people also buy everyday goods:
Just as important, selling chemical abortion drugs undermines a retail pharmacy’s bottom line. Instead of selling a lifetime supply of everyday goods like diapers, cough syrup, groceries, toys, food, and clothing, a store settles for a one-time purchase that undermines a lifetime of opportunity.
Another signatory of the ADF letter, proxy voting, and corporate engagement consultant Jerry Bowyer, did some cursed napkin math for an interview with American Family News. Here’s what Bowyer said:
Apart from the moral aspect, Bowyer says selling the drug makes no sense from a financial standpoint, as abortion eliminates future revenue from customers who would otherwise need diapers, formula, medicine, clothing, and a myriad of extras for the rest of their lives.Costco, for example, could make $200 now off of the death of an unborn child, or it could make $12,000 over 10 years, he poses.