Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Opinions About Weed Are Baffling, At Best
PoliticsDebbie Wasserman Schultz, US Representative for Florida and head of the Democratic National Committee, has been in the news more frequently since the Bernie Sanders email breach fracas. But she might find herself highlighted with another claim to fame once America gets a load of her baffling (idiotic?) comments on drugs—specifically, marijuana control.
In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Ana Marie Cox used her (condensed and edited) time with the Congressperson to ask about her less-than-progressive viewpoints on marijuana; specifically, that she opposes its legalization, signifying a general break with the party’s prevailing conventional wisdom and an issue that has been divisive for her in the past.
You’re one of a dwindling number of progressive politicians who oppose legalization of even the medical use of marijuana. Where does that come from? I don’t oppose the use of medical marijuana. I just don’t think we should legalize more mind-altering substances if we want to make it less likely that people travel down the path toward using drugs. We have had a resurgence of drug use instead of a decline. There is a huge heroin epidemic.
Heroin addiction often starts with prescribed painkillers. Pill mills were a problem in Florida, but the state didn’t make prescribing opiates illegal. There is a difference between opiates and marijuana.
Yes, there really is a difference between opiates and marijuana! Mainly in that the heroin epidemic that the Rep. seems to be so concerned about cannot be directly traced back to the overuse of weed, but it actually can be directly traced back to the overprescription of opiates such as Oxycontin, which hooked users and led the addicted to turn to cheaper, easier-to-acquire street drugs. Such as horse.