Barnes & Noble Censors Cover Featuring Androgynous Male Model
LatestBarnes & Noble recently took an unusual step — the bookstore chain required the magazine Dossier wrap its new issue in opaque plastic before agreeing to stock it. The problem with the cover? Nudity. More specifically, the nude torso of the famously androgynous male model Andrej Pejic. Barnes & Noble was concerned customers would mistake Pejic for a shirtless woman.
Above left is the cover in question; at the right are a few popular magazines whose male cover subjects’ bare chests Barnes & Noble apparently did not require to be hidden from sight.
Dossier co-founder and creative director Skye Parrott told me that the directive came as a shock. “We knew that this cover presented a very strong, androgynous image,” said Parrott, “and that could make some people uncomfortable. That’s partly why we chose it. I guess it has made someone pretty uncomfortable.” Added Parrott, “I’ve been talking to all my friends who work in magazines, and nobody I know has ever heard of anything like this happening. Especially with a guy. Guys are shirtless on magazine covers all the time.”
When the message came that Barnes & Noble and Borders, the two largest North American bookstore chains, were requiring the issue be bagged, Parrott says Dossier asked if the stores realized that Pejic is, in fact, a man. The response, relayed via Dossier‘s distributor, was that the stores were aware of this fact but were still insisting on the opaque covering because “the model is young and it could be deemed as a naked female.” Dossier was given the “choice” to accept the opaque wrappers or forfeit the order. (Parrott said her understanding was that the copies that had been destined for the two chain stores would have been destroyed had Dossier not accepted their request.) The opaque covers affect a little less than 10% of Dossier‘s 20,000 worldwide print run; international chains like the U.K.’s WHSmith, where Dossier is also stocked, apparently do not share Barnes & Noble’s and Borders’ concern.
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
 
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
        