The University of Oklahoma’s first-ever coed floor brings up an important question about college students’ living space: should gender-segregated housing be a thing of the past?
OU’s a little behind the curve — many schools have had coed floors for years. At my alma mater, the four different coed floors I lived on generated a disappointing total of zero orgies (or maybe I just wasn’t invited). UPenn, Brown, and Stanford all allow coed doubles, with several other universities considering such a program. And Wesleyan has allowed students of different genders to room together since 1995. OU President David Boren said on the issue, “To be honest with you we live in the state of Oklahoma, our values are not necessarily the same elsewhere” — but a March editorial in the OU Daily argued, “Instead of gender-segregated housing we should have co-ed and gender-neutral housing,” and maybe it’s time for Oklahoma’s values to catch up.
Gender-segregated housing should still be an option for students who prefer a single-gender environment. But increasingly, colleges seem to be learning that not all students identify with one gender, and even for those who do, the assumption that single-gender housing is always more comfortable is pretty heteronormative. All college students deserve access to gender-neutral housing — they’re sophisticated enough that they don’t need to be systematically kept away from an entire gender for fear that they might bone. And if they really want to have an orgy, a little thing like gender-segregated housing probably isn’t going to stop them.
Column: Gender-Blind Housing Must Be An Option [OU Daily]
Image via Tanya len/Shutterstock.com