At the nationwide philosophy conference where most new hires in the field are made, a cocktail party called “the smoker” is part of the hiring process. And some philosophers, especially women, would prefer that evaluation of job candidates take place in a less boozy environment.
That’s a problem because the reception often involves heavy drinking, which doesn’t necessarily promote sound hiring decisions. It’s also not particularly advantageous for pregnant job-seekers — one candidate, currently expecting her third child, says the event will involve “spending several nights up late, standing in uncomfortable shoes in a hotel ballroom, sipping cranberry juice while talking to tipsy prospective employers.” She adds,
All the literature on interviewing suggests that it is best done in a structured setting where each candidate gets an equal chance to speak and the effects of bias are kept to a minimum, so what do we think is going to happen when we conduct a second round of “informal” interviews, now late at night, over drinks, and in a dimly lit room? Those of us with small children or heavy sleep needs just need to deal with it, I guess. While I know that there are plenty of men who face these challenges as well, it is hard to imagine a better piece of evidence of the maleness of our profession.
But hey, look at the bright side: the only other time I’ve attended the smoker, I was hit on. This time around, my pregnant figure is likely to keep me from being subjected to that.
University of Chicago Brian Leiter calls the practice “probably a leftover from the time before equal employment laws kicked in.” It does harken back to the era of old boys clubs and job offers made over whiskey and cigars — an era that may not actually have ended. This form of hiring isn’t just bad for women — it disadvantages anyone who, for any reason, isn’t at his or her best in a cocktail party environment. And as Jennifer Saul of the University of Sheffield says, mingling and glad-handing are “not actually the skill[s] they should be looking for in academic jobs.”
Whether or not actual hiring decisions are made there, philosophers seem to feel that the smoker is more than just a networking event — and that in itself is a problem. At least some job candidates evidently think that they need to attend the party and charm their prospective employers if they want to get a job. If that’s not true, then university hiring committees need to make that abundantly clear. And if it is true, they may want to rethink their priorities.
Something’s Smoking [Inside Higher Ed]
The Smoker: What Are We, As A Profession, Thinking?? [What Is It Like To Be A Woman In Philosophy?]
Image via Yeko Photo Studio/Shutterstock.com