The filing, which was published by the Louisiana Illuminator on Tuesday, said this means the funds “could have paid pregnancy centers for services ineligible for funding under state law.” For example, of those 12 CPCs, at least five offered some sort of “abortion pill reversal” service, which, uh, does not exist. The outlet also reported that Landry’s office plans to continue funding CPCs and has raised its annual spending cap per center in the latest budget cycle. Jezebel reached out to Landry’s office, but they declined to comment.
“In a state like Louisiana, where legitimate resources for pregnant people are difficult to access or completely inaccessible, sending it to these crisis pregnancy centers is unconscionable,” Michele Erenberg, the executive director of Lift Louisiana, told Jezebel. Her organization, she explains, is fighting a lonely battle in the state–and is also one of the only organizations to launch “any sort of investigation or public pushback on these unlicensed pregnancy centers.”
In 2024, Louisiana passed SB 278 (dubiously called the “Pregnancy and Baby Care Initiative”), which stipulates that designated state funding is only meant for “counseling, mentoring, classes and material items such as cribs or diapers,” according to the Illuminator, and requires the DCFS to work with an umbrella nonprofit organization to distribute the public money into CPCs. But without that nonprofit acting as a middleman, the auditor’s report was unable to discern how exactly the $1.2 million was spent.
CPCs are a growing collection of predatory pests in post-Roe America, and have received concerning amounts of public funding since 2022. According to a ProPublica report, Missouri leads the U.S. in its per-capita investment in CPCs, and, in 2024, Texas was revealed to be sending around $140 million to its anti-abortion centers (an amount that ballooned from $5 million in 2005). The Illuminator also noted that, as of June, there were 38 CPCs in Louisiana, meaning most of those centers did not receive state funds this round.
“I’m not super optimistic that we’re going to see an immediate decrease in this funding,” Erenberg concluded. “I think that the most important thing is that…the legislators move to have more transparency, more oversight, more accountability.”
Like what you just read? You’ve got great taste. Subscribe to Jezebel, and for $5 a month or $50 a year, you’ll get access to a bunch of subscriber benefits, including getting to read the next article (and all the ones after that) ad-free. Plus, you’ll be supporting independent journalism—which, can you even imagine not supporting independent journalism in times like these? Yikes.