The Coverage of Olivia Nuzzi and RFK Jr. Has Gotten Gross
The initial story of the affair and its potential ramifications for access journalism was and is the only newsworthy thing about this whole saga.
Politics
At the end of last week, the political gossip side of the internet was rocked with a slate of sex scandals that varied in predictability. News that noted pervert Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) once attended a sex party where a 17-year-old was present, for example, was not especially surprising. But the revelation that star New York magazine political reporter Olivia Nuzzi is on leave over a “non-physical,” sexting affair with former independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.? That shocked people.
The affair reportedly lasted roughly eight months, beginning shortly after Nuzzi’s November 2023 profile of the then-candidate. And when it was brought to New York editor-in-chief David Haskell’s attention, he confronted her and she eventually copped to it after initially denying it. That is pretty much all we—the New York magazine reading public, that is—need to know about this story. (I’d argue that, if you don’t read New York magazine, this scandal is entirely irrelevant to you and you don’t need to know anything about it.) But as is often the case with media scandals, coverage and discussion of the story got way too detailed almost immediately.
Among the grossest and most eye roll-inducing subplots here is the sexist narrative coming from the New York Post via Kennedy’s camp, alleging that an “obsessed” Nuzzi stalked and victimized him. However, as a Vanity Fair report pointed out, this is highly unbelievable coming from “a man who has been accused of sexual assault and has a long and well-documented history of allegedly pursuing women while he is married.”
like most sane people on here, I agree that the nuzzi situation was a big ethical nono, she prob shouldn’t cover presidential elections for a while (also she’s talented and will be just fine)