A Democratic representative from Pennsylvania’s 112th district wants to introduce a bill that would make it harder for victims of abuse to file for protective orders, and he’s looking for other lawmakers to back him up.
Representative Kevin Haggerty is working on a bill that would require individuals seeking protection from their violent spouses but lack “substantive evidence” to take drug and alcohol tests in order to receive support.
What’s left unsaid in Haggerty’s memo is that he has been accused of domestic abuse, and that his ex-wife, Jennifer Haggerty, filed for a PFA order against him in 2017. According to the Scranton Times-Tribune, Jennifer reported in her petition that Haggerty hit her “in the head hard enough that she suffered temporary hearing loss and numbness in the face.” (“The allegations raised against Mr. Kevin Haggerty are of a personal nature between his wife, Jennifer, and himself,” Haggerty’s lawyer wrote in a statement at the time. “It is not appropriate that he comment at this time regarding said allegations.”)
A judge granted Jennifer a temporary protection order, which barred Haggerty from their home. According to Pittsburgh’s NPR station 90.5 WESA, she did not go on to press charges.
According to Haggerty’s memo, lawmakers should be doing more to prevent petitions for PFA orders from being filed “under false pretense”:
There is a growing, yet thus far unexplored contingent of PFA petitions filed under false pretense. The manifestation of this trend has been seen across the country. One recent study of PFA petitions in Delaware found 16% of petitions to have been filed fraudulently, with the petitioners leveling false accusations against their partners most frequently in messy break-ups, separations, and divorce cases.
That 16 percent figure is a reference to a 2015 report from the Delaware News Journal that found 16 percent of the petitions were dismissed because “no abuse was found at trial.” (The Domestic Violence Crisis Center’s annual report for 2016 stated 15 percent of petitions in Delaware were dismissed because no evidence of abuse was found.) The “fraudulent” language is Haggerty’s alone.
In the memo, he writes that he is worried about the effect these petitions can have on those falsely accused of abuse:
“The impact a false petition for a PFA can have on its subject is incalculable. Not only does it damage the reputation of the individual within the community and the workplace, it could lead to unjust incarceration.”
In response to Haggerty’s memo, Julie Bancroft of the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence sent a letter to the state House denouncing the proposal. “The memo suggests that if there’s drug or alcohol use that somehow negates the reality of abuse,” Bancroft wrote, “and that’s just not the case.”
Haggerty is not the only lawmaker in the news this week for his views about victims. Last week, a Republican representative from Texas bizarrely defended a man accused of killing his wife by describing the victim as “unfair” towards her husband. “She demanded something, and he was out,” Representative Pete Sessions, a top Republican in the House, said. “And it was frustration.”
“Frustration.”
As the Scranton Times-Tribune reported, in her PFA petition, Jennifer Haggerty wrote that her ex-husband “head-butted her, threw her to the ground, pulled her hair, pushed her, threw other objects at her and punched her in the leg,” including, at times, in front of their two children.
