A Texas State Senator Seems to Have Broken a Glass Table With His Gavel While Cutting Off Pro-Choice Testimony
Politics
On Wednesday, a trio of anti-abortion measures continued to wend their way through the Texas State Legislature, buoyed by Republicans’ expectations for a more conservative Supreme Court. A Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing included testimony from NARAL Texas legislative intern Maggie Hennessy, whose speech decrying SB 415 ended abruptly when Committee Chairman Charles Schwertner (R-Georgetown) smashed his gavel quite hard on the glass table, which was later shown to have cracked. Seems like ridiculously bad optics for a guy trying to crack down on women’s reproductive rights, but what do I know?
Senate Bill 8, inspired by last year’s discredited Planned Parenthood “sting” videos, targets fetal tissue donations and prohibits a type of “partial-birth” abortion that is already illegal; Senate Bill 415 would pan dilation and evacuation or D&E (though it is referred to in the bill as “dismemberment”), the safest and most common form of second-trimester abortion; and Senate Bill 258 would require the burial of fetal tissue following abortions. Following last year’s Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt Supreme Court decision, which threw out a Texas abortion law partly on the basis that it didn’t actually protect women’s health, the bills in question—all sponsored by men—didn’t even try to make that argument. Meanwhile, as the Texas Tribune recounts, pro-life activists compared the abortion fight to the Holocaust and pushed Republican lawmakers to go ahead and ban abortion outright.
“This bill is full of false, medically inaccurate, ideological language designed to further stigmatize and shame women receiving abortion care,” Hennessy testified, referring to SB 415. “It’s an outright ban on the safest abortion method for some patients. In order to obtain care that is not banned by this bill, women would be forced to undergo an additional, invasive and unnecessary medical procedure, even against the medical judgment of their physician.”