Bachmann Not Pro-Slave Family, Still Pro-Curing Gays
LatestThe Iowa far-right group whose pledge essentially expressed nostalgia for the slave family is withdrawing that portion of the pledge, saying, “It was not meant to be racist or anything.” (Really.) Michele Bachmann, who signed it, is claiming she wasn’t endorsing that “preamble” in a four-page document. Meanwhile, an undercover investigation reveals that Marcus Bachmann lied about whether his counseling practice tries to “cure” homosexuality.
A statement from the FAMiLY Leader this weekend backtracked from the original language, which read, “Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.” As was widely pointed out late last week, not only was this philosophically abhorrent, it was historically inaccurate. The group kept out of that detail, though:
“After careful deliberation and wise insight and input from valued colleagues we deeply respect, we agree that the statement referencing children born into slavery can be misconstrued, and such misconstruction can detract from the core message of the Marriage Vow: that ALL of us must work to strengthen and support families and marriages between one woman and one man. We sincerely apologize for any negative feelings this has caused, and have removed the language from the vow.”
But the extemporaneous comments from a Family Leader spokeswoman were even more illuminating: “It was not meant to be racist or anything. It was just a fact that back in the days of slavery there was usually a husband and a wife…we were not saying at all that things are better for African-American children in slavery days than today.” No, actually that was not a fact. The data they cite begins in 1880, after slavery ended. Slave marriages, such as they were able to exist, had no legal standing. Families that did exist were ripped apart for transactional reasons.
Of course, if you ask the Bachmann campaign, she didn’t really sign that part, which was before the bullet points. And the point is, slavery was bad, but so are taxes!