How Dirty Dare They
EntertainmentHow many layers of ersatz must a piece of culture be wrapped in before it buckles under the weight of its own falsity? Would you believe two? It’s true. The proof is on the soundtrack to ABC’s Dirty Dancing remake, which is airing next week and already has received scathing reviews (Variety’s Sonya Sariya calls it, “a sappy, passionless, schlocky remake of the original, without even the iota of imagination necessary to expand upon the 1987 film”). It is reportedly virtually shot-for-shot, albeit the Jewishness is turned way down, there’s a new subplot in which Baby’s sister solves racism, and it has a musical-theater element in that many of the characters sporadically burst out into song. If that doesn’t sound hellish enough, fire up the three-hour TV movie’s soundtrack on Spotify and luxuriate in sonic brimstone.
Dirty Dancing was an ‘80s movie fueled by nostalgia for the ‘60s. The Dirty Dancing remake is a ‘10s movie fueled by nostalgia for the ‘80s. Our pop culture’s endless tail-chasing is an explanation as to how we arrived upon a torturous 17 tracks of whos (Greyson Chance, Calum Scott, Bea Miller) and future-whos (Karmin, Nicole Scherzinger) singing spit-shined renditions of the ‘50s, ‘60s, and, anachronistically, ‘80s songs that populated the 1987 movie’s two-volume soundtrack, but it’s no excuse. And said explanation fails to cover just exactly who has any use for this compilation of atrocities. People who want to hear the music of Dirty Dancing, but shittier? Young kids who want to dip their toe into oldies but are afraid of all of the texture on ancient artifacts? Old people who don’t have their reading glasses? Older people with arthritis who can’t type that many letters into the Spotify search field without causing themselves great pain and just click on the first thing that comes up when you search “DIRTY DA”? People of all walks of life who have just given up and are willing to lie down and be spoonfed utter shit while keeping their rapidly decomposing fingers crossed that there might be some sort of nutritional value in there somewhere?